Talk:cpp/language/object
From cppreference.com
Is IA64 NaT actually a trap? Is the additional bit in the register considered part of the value? Szpanczyk (talk) 14:46, 25 March 2017 (PDT)
- to quote Raymond Chen "If you have a register whose value is NaT and you so much as breathe on it the wrong way (for example, try to save its value to memory), the processor will raise a STATUS_REG_NAT_CONSUMPTION exception." --Cubbi (talk) 10:09, 26 March 2017 (PDT)
[edit] Internal contradiction?
At the beginning of the article it is stated that bit fields are not objects, but then the phrase objects that are not bit fields is used several times.
--- Vladislav
